short: be banned in pools

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings long hair
Weight: 0.32
, only
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in pools 1.00
be banned in french pools 0.93
be allowed in swimming pools 0.88
be allowed in french swimming pools 0.85
be banned in school 0.81
be banned building 0.81
be banned in france 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(short, be banned in pools)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(short, be banned in french pools)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(short, be banned in french pools)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(short, be banned in french pools)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(short, be allowed in swimming pools)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(short, be allowed in swimming pools)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(short, be allowed in swimming pools)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(short, be allowed in french swimming pools)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(short, be allowed in french swimming pools)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(short, be allowed in french swimming pools)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(short, be banned in french pools)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(short, be allowed in french swimming pools)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(short, be allowed in swimming pools)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(short, be banned in school)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(short, be banned building)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(short, be banned in school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(short, be banned in school)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(short, be banned building)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(short, be banned in france)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(short, be banned in france)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(short, be banned in france)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(short, be banned in school)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(short, be banned building)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(short, be banned building)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(short, be banned in france)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(short, be banned in pools)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(short, be banned in pools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(short, be banned in pools)