shoulder: has temporal arrangement rotation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgery
Weight: 0.66
, pain
Weight: 0.63
, body part
Weight: 0.63
, injury
Weight: 0.60
Siblings upper arm
Weight: 0.65
, scapula
Weight: 0.45
, knee
Weight: 0.37
, hip
Weight: 0.36
, chest pain
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has temporal arrangement rotation 1.00
is rotation important 0.84
is internal rotation 0.84
is internal rotation important 0.83
is external rotation 0.83
is external rotation important 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hip, is internal rotation important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hip, is external rotation important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(hip, is external rotation important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hip, is external rotation important)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hip, is internal rotation important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(hip, is internal rotation important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, is internal rotation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, is rotation important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, is internal rotation important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, is external rotation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, is external rotation important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(shoulder, is rotation important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(shoulder, is internal rotation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(shoulder, is internal rotation important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(shoulder, is external rotation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(shoulder, is external rotation important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(shoulder, is internal rotation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(shoulder, is external rotation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(shoulder, is rotation important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(shoulder, is internal rotation important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shoulder, is external rotation important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shoulder, is external rotation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shoulder, is internal rotation)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shoulder, is external rotation important)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shoulder, is rotation important)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shoulder, is internal rotation important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hip, is external rotation important)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, has temporal arrangement rotation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hip, is internal rotation important)