show: be in wisconsin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.81
, tv show
Weight: 0.76
, game show
Weight: 0.75
, television show
Weight: 0.74
Siblings soap opera
Weight: 0.70
, fresh air
Weight: 0.67
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.67
, full house
Weight: 0.65
, radio
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in wisconsin 1.00
be in austin on 16th 0.80
be in chicago 0.80
be in america air 0.78
be in boston 0.77
being are cancelled on nbc 0.76
be in philly start 0.75
is john oliver 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, is john oliver)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fresh air, is john oliver) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fresh air, is john oliver)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(show, be in wisconsin)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(show, be in chicago)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(show, be in chicago)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(show, be in chicago)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(show, be in chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(show, be in wisconsin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(show, be in wisconsin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(show, be in wisconsin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fresh air, is john oliver)