show: be used to fun

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.81
, tv show
Weight: 0.76
, game show
Weight: 0.75
, television show
Weight: 0.74
Siblings soap opera
Weight: 0.70
, fresh air
Weight: 0.67
, radio
Weight: 0.65
, rock
Weight: 0.64
, talk
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to fun 1.00
be funny 0.79
be used to enjoyment 0.76
causes laugh 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tv show, be funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(show, be used to fun)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tv show, be funny)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tv show, be funny)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes laugh)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(tv show, be funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(show, be used to fun)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(talk, causes laugh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(talk, causes laugh)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(show, be used to fun)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(show, be used to enjoyment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(show, be used to enjoyment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(show, be used to enjoyment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(show, be used to enjoyment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(show, be used to fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(show, be used to fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tv show, be funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(talk, causes laugh)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(show, be used to fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tv show, be funny)