shrewsbury: be prone to flooding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.43
, community
Weight: 0.42
, school
Weight: 0.41
Siblings village
Weight: 0.28
, quebec city
Weight: 0.28
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.28
, new york city
Weight: 0.28
, district
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to flooding 1.00
flood 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(town, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(city, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(place, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(place, flood)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(city, flood)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(town, flood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(place, flood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(city, flood)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(town, flood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(town, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(city, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(place, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shrewsbury, flood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(shrewsbury, flood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shrewsbury, flood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, flood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(place, flood)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(town, flood)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, flood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(place, flood)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(town, flood)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(shrewsbury, be prone to flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, flood)