shrimp: be bad for diabetics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.72
, shellfish
Weight: 0.70
, bait
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.39
, crab
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.38
, crawfish
Weight: 0.37
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for diabetics 1.00
be bad for cholesterol 0.83
have cholesterol 0.79
is cholesterol 0.79
be high in cholesterol 0.79
is high cholesterol 0.79
contain cholesterol 0.78
raise cholesterol 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shellfish, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(shellfish, be high in cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellfish, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(shellfish, have cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(seafood, have cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(seafood, be high in cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shellfish, be bad for diabetics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shellfish, be bad for cholesterol)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(seafood, be high in cholesterol)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shellfish, have cholesterol)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(shellfish, be high in cholesterol)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be bad for diabetics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be bad for cholesterol)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, have cholesterol)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be high in cholesterol)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be high in cholesterol)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, have cholesterol)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be high in cholesterol)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shellfish, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shellfish, be bad for cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(shellfish, have cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(seafood, have cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(shellfish, be high in cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(seafood, be high in cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lobster, have cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lobster, have cholesterol)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lobster, be high in cholesterol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lobster, be high in cholesterol)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for cholesterol)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(shrimp, be bad for cholesterol)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for cholesterol)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(shrimp, be high in cholesterol)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be high in cholesterol)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is high cholesterol)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(shrimp, is high cholesterol)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is high cholesterol)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, raise cholesterol)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shrimp, raise cholesterol)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(shrimp, raise cholesterol)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(shrimp, have cholesterol)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, have cholesterol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(shrimp, have cholesterol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for cholesterol)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(shrimp, is high cholesterol)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(shrimp, raise cholesterol)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(shrimp, have cholesterol)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be high in cholesterol)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(shrimp, be high in cholesterol)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for diabetics)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for cholesterol)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(shellfish, have cholesterol)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seafood, be high in cholesterol)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(shellfish, be high in cholesterol)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lobster, have cholesterol)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(lobster, be high in cholesterol)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for diabetics)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seafood, be high in cholesterol)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for cholesterol)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(seafood, have cholesterol)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(shellfish, have cholesterol)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(shrimp, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(shellfish, be high in cholesterol)