shrimp: be eat at dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.72
, shellfish
Weight: 0.70
, bait
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, ingredient
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.39
, crab
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.38
, eel
Weight: 0.36
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be eat at dinner 1.00
be at delicious meal 0.86
be eat at best restaurant 0.84
be cook before they be eat 0.84
be at restaurant because person eat them 0.83
be nice to eat 0.81
be at dessert 0.81
be at chinese buffet 0.79
be at salad 0.78
be clean before eat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be eat at best restaurant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(seafood, be eat at best restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at dessert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be eat at best restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at salad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at chinese buffet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(oyster, be nice to eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at delicious meal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(seafood, be eat at best restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at dessert)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(crab, be at delicious meal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(crab, be at delicious meal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(oyster, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(oyster, be nice to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(crab, be at chinese buffet)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(crab, be at chinese buffet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(crab, be at salad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(crab, be at salad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(shrimp, be eat at dinner)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be cook before they be eat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be clean before eat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(shrimp, be cook before they be eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(shrimp, be cook before they be eat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrimp, be clean before eat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(shrimp, be clean before eat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be cook before they be eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be clean before eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seafood, be eat at best restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(crab, be at delicious meal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(oyster, be nice to eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(crab, be at salad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(crab, be at chinese buffet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(seafood, be eat at best restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(shrimp, be eat at dinner)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(creature, be at dessert)