shrimp: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.72
, shellfish
Weight: 0.70
, bait
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.39
, crab
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.38
, crawfish
Weight: 0.37
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
be expensive at restaurants 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seafood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seafood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shellfish, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(seafood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(seafood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shellfish, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(seafood, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(seafood, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lobster, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(oyster, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(seafood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seafood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shellfish, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(seafood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(seafood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lobster, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lobster, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crawfish, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(crawfish, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mackerel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mackerel, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(oyster, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(oyster, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(shrimp, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shrimp, is more expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(shrimp, is more expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(shrimp, is more expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(seafood, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(seafood, is more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shellfish, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lobster, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(crawfish, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oyster, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mackerel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shellfish, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(seafood, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(shrimp, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(seafood, is more expensive)