siberia: was entitled as land of ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.53
, location
Weight: 0.50
, part
Weight: 0.44
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.28
, central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, east asia
Weight: 0.28
, convenience store
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was entitled as land of ice 1.00
was entitled as land 0.93
be called land of ice 0.89
land of ice 0.88
be called land 0.81
be referred as land 0.78
be known as land 0.77
was entitled as tears 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(siberia, be called land of ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(siberia, be called land of ice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(siberia, be called land of ice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(siberia, land of ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(siberia, land of ice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(siberia, be called land of ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(siberia, land of ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(siberia, land of ice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(siberia, be called land)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(siberia, be called land)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(siberia, be called land)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(siberia, be known as land)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(siberia, be known as land)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(siberia, be called land)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as tears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(siberia, be referred as land)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(siberia, was entitled as tears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(siberia, was entitled as land)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(siberia, be referred as land)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(siberia, was entitled as tears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(siberia, was entitled as tears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(siberia, was entitled as land)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(siberia, be known as land)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(siberia, be referred as land)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(siberia, be referred as land)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(siberia, be known as land)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(siberia, was entitled as land of ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(siberia, was entitled as land of ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(siberia, was entitled as land of ice)