sibling: be important to us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.63
, relative
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sister
Weight: 0.35
, daughter
Weight: 0.34
, parent
Weight: 0.34
, uncle
Weight: 0.33
, boy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to us 1.00
is good thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(sibling, be important to us)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(sibling, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is good thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sibling, is good thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sibling, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sibling, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sibling, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sibling, be important to us)