sibling: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.63
, relative
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sister
Weight: 0.35
, daughter
Weight: 0.34
, parent
Weight: 0.34
, uncle
Weight: 0.33
, boy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good thing 0.78
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sister, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(sister, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sister, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sibling, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sibling, is good thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(sibling, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sibling, is good thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sibling, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sibling, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sibling, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sister, has quality good)