sight: be in game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sense
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.59
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, need
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.67
, ground zero
Weight: 0.64
, times square
Weight: 0.63
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.63
, waterfall
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in game 1.00
be in game work 0.95
be for games 0.89
be for football players 0.80
be for games calculated 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(experience, be for games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sight, be in game)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(need, be for football players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sight, be in game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(experience, be in game work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sight, be in game)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(experience, be for games calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sight, be in game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(experience, be in game work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(experience, be for games)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(experience, be for games calculated)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(need, be for football players)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in game work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(experience, be for games)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(need, be for football players)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(experience, be for games calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(experience, be in game work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sight, be in game)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(experience, be for games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sight, be in game)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(need, be for football players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sight, be in game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(experience, be for games calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sight, be in game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sight, be in game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sight, be in game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(experience, be in game work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experience, be for games)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(need, be for football players)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be for games calculated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(experience, be in game work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experience, be for games)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(experience, be for games calculated)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sight, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(need, be for football players)