sight: is best sense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sense
Weight: 0.64
, experience
Weight: 0.59
, distance
Weight: 0.59
, need
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.67
, ground zero
Weight: 0.64
, times square
Weight: 0.63
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.63
, waterfall
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best sense 1.00
is sense 0.92
is important sense 0.91
is most important sense 0.91
be called sense 0.89
be called common sense 0.86
is fastest sense 0.85
is great 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sense, be called common sense)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sight, is best sense)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sense, be called sense)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sight, is best sense)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sense, be called sense)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sense, be called common sense)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sense, be called sense)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sense, be called common sense)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(times square, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sense, be called common sense)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sight, is best sense)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sense, be called sense)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sight, is best sense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(times square, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(times square, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sight, is best sense)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sight, is sense)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sight, is sense)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(sight, is sense)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sight, is important sense)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sight, is important sense)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sight, is most important sense)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sight, is most important sense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sight, is important sense)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sight, is fastest sense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sight, is most important sense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sight, is fastest sense)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sight, is fastest sense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sight, is most important sense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sight, is fastest sense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sight, is important sense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sight, is sense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sight, is best sense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sense, be called sense)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(sense, be called common sense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(times square, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sense, be called sense)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(sight, is best sense)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(sense, be called common sense)