silicone: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.69
, plastic
Weight: 0.66
, gel
Weight: 0.66
, filler
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
Siblings resin
Weight: 0.37
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.37
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.36
, acrylic
Weight: 0.36
, hair gel
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is fantastic 0.90
be good 0.86
has quality good 0.81
is big 0.80
is terrible 0.79
be important to us 0.77
be terrible for environment 0.76
be important to things 0.75
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(plastic, be good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silicone, is great)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silicone, is great)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silicone, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(plastic, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(gel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(plastic, be good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(silicone, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(silicone, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(silicone, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(acrylic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(acrylic, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(silicone, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silicone, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(plastic, be good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(acrylic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acrylic, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(plastic, be good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(silicone, is great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)