silk: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.71
, material
Weight: 0.64
, textile
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings linen
Weight: 0.37
, velvet
Weight: 0.37
, rayon
Weight: 0.37
, cashmere
Weight: 0.37
, wool
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
was developed 0.81
was created 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(textile, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(silk, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(textile, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(textile, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rayon, was developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(textile, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(silk, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rayon, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rayon, was developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(silk, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(silk, was created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(silk, was created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(silk, was created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(silk, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silk, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(silk, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(textile, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rayon, was developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(silk, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(textile, was invented)