sin: has quality sins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.60
, deity
Weight: 0.59
, error
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.69
, slavery
Weight: 0.68
, jealousy
Weight: 0.68
, vanity
Weight: 0.67
, idolatry
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality sins 1.00
has quality sin 0.88
be called sin 0.82
be fault of sinner 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(idolatry, has quality sin)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(jealousy, has quality sin)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(vanity, has quality sin)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality sin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(jealousy, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(jealousy, has quality sin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(vanity, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vanity, has quality sin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(idolatry, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(idolatry, has quality sin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sin, has quality sins)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sin)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality sin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sin, be called sin)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sin, be called sin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sin, be called sin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sin, be fault of sinner)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sin, has quality sin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sin, be called sin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sin, be fault of sinner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sin, be fault of sinner)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sin, be fault of sinner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(jealousy, has quality sin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(vanity, has quality sin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sins)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(idolatry, has quality sin)