singapore: was involved in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents indonesia
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.60
, malaysia
Weight: 0.56
Siblings london
Weight: 0.62
, sabah
Weight: 0.36
, australia
Weight: 0.35
, new york city
Weight: 0.35
, washington
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was involved in past 1.00
be named in past 0.82
was involved in agriculture 0.78
was badly affected during syonan years 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(singapore, was involved in past)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(singapore, be named in past)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(singapore, was badly affected during syonan years)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(singapore, was badly affected during syonan years)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(singapore, was badly affected during syonan years)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(singapore, was involved in agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(singapore, be named in past)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(singapore, was involved in agriculture)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(singapore, was involved in agriculture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(singapore, be named in past)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(singapore, was badly affected during syonan years)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(singapore, was involved in agriculture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(singapore, be named in past)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(singapore, was involved in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(singapore, was involved in past)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(singapore, was involved in past)