singer: stand close to microphone

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.68
, writer
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, star
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.65
, pianist
Weight: 0.64
, rapper
Weight: 0.59
, composer
Weight: 0.59
, comedian
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
stand close to microphone 1.00
use microphone 0.91
be at mike 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(musician, be at mike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(singer, stand close to microphone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(musician, be at mike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at mike)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(musician, be at mike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(singer, stand close to microphone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(singer, stand close to microphone)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(singer, use microphone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(singer, use microphone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(singer, use microphone)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(singer, use microphone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(singer, stand close to microphone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(singer, stand close to microphone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(musician, be at mike)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(singer, stand close to microphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(musician, be at mike)