single: pay higher taxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, product
Weight: 0.47
, family
Weight: 0.44
Siblings double
Weight: 0.33
, triple
Weight: 0.32
, pop
Weight: 0.32
, second
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
pay higher taxes 1.00
pay more taxes 0.97
pay taxes 0.96
get taxed more 0.80
is taxed more 0.80
get taxed 0.79
is taxed 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(single, pay higher taxes)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(single, pay more taxes)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(single, pay more taxes)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(single, pay more taxes)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(single, pay taxes)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(single, pay taxes)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(single, pay taxes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(single, pay taxes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(single, pay more taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(single, get taxed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(single, get taxed more)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(single, get taxed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(single, get taxed more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(single, get taxed more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(single, is taxed more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(single, is taxed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(single, get taxed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(single, is taxed more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(single, is taxed more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(single, is taxed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(single, get taxed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(single, is taxed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(single, is taxed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(single, get taxed more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(single, is taxed more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(single, pay higher taxes)