site: be thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents historical site
Weight: 0.82
, web site
Weight: 0.76
, portal
Weight: 0.66
, topic
Weight: 0.66
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.83
, web page
Weight: 0.76
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.71
, ground zero
Weight: 0.70
, public library
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be thing 1.00
want know 0.76
be like omegle used by guys 0.75
has trait fun 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(portal, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(site, be thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(portal, has trait fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(portal, has trait fun)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(portal, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(site, be thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(site, be thing)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(site, be like omegle used by guys)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(site, be like omegle used by guys)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(site, be like omegle used by guys)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(site, be like omegle used by guys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(site, be thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(site, be thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(portal, has trait fun)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(site, be thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(portal, has trait fun)