site: cost money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents historical site
Weight: 0.82
, web site
Weight: 0.76
, portal
Weight: 0.66
, topic
Weight: 0.66
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.83
, web page
Weight: 0.76
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.71
, ground zero
Weight: 0.70
, public library
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost money 1.00
make money 0.85
get money 0.85
actually make money 0.82
make off money 0.80
earn money 0.78
is expensive 0.77
is cash 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(historical site, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(topic, is cash)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(historical site, make money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(historical site, make money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(topic, is cash)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(historical site, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(topic, is cash)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(historical site, make money)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(historical site, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(historical site, make money)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(site, cost money)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(historical site, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(site, cost money)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(topic, is cash)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(site, cost money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(site, cost money)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(site, make money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(site, actually make money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(site, make money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(site, actually make money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(site, make money)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(site, actually make money)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, make money)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(site, actually make money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(site, cost money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(historical site, make money)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(topic, is cash)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(historical site, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(historical site, make money)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(topic, is cash)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(site, cost money)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(historical site, is expensive)