skating: is illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, sport
Weight: 0.58
, exercise
Weight: 0.56
, winter
Weight: 0.53
, activity
Weight: 0.50
Siblings ice skating
Weight: 0.36
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.36
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.35
, hockey game
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is illegal 1.00
is ilegal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(skateboarding, is illegal)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hockey stick, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(hockey stick, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hockey stick, is illegal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(skateboarding, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(skateboarding, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(skating, is illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(skating, is ilegal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(skating, is ilegal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(skating, is ilegal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(skating, is ilegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(skating, is illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(skating, is illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(skateboarding, is illegal)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(skating, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hockey stick, is illegal)