:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(snowboard, is wide)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ski, is wide)
Similarity expansion
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ski, is wider now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ski, is wider)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ski, is wider now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ski, is wider)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ski, get wider)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(ski, get wider)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ski, is wider now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ski, is wider)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ski, get wider)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ski, is wider)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ski, get wider)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ski, is wider now)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ski, is wide)
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ski, is wide)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ski, is wide)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(snowboard, is wide)