ski: were improved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.62
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings snowboard
Weight: 0.56
, skiing
Weight: 0.37
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were improved 1.00
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(snowboarding, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ski, were improved)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ski, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ski, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ski, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ski, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ski, were improved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ski, were improved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ski, were improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(snowboarding, has quality better)