skiing: be downhill judged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, water sport
Weight: 0.62
, pursuit
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, exercise
Weight: 0.56
Siblings snow skiing
Weight: 0.39
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.38
, ski
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be downhill judged 1.00
be downhill scored 0.84
be judged 0.82
downhill burn calories 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, be judged)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ski, be judged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ski, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ski, be judged)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(snowboarding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, be judged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(skiing, be downhill judged)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(skiing, downhill burn calories)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(skiing, downhill burn calories)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skiing, be judged)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(skiing, be downhill scored)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(skiing, downhill burn calories)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be judged)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be downhill scored)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(skiing, be judged)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(skiing, be judged)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(skiing, be downhill scored)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(skiing, be downhill scored)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(skiing, downhill burn calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(skiing, be downhill judged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ski, be judged)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be downhill judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(snowboarding, be judged)