skiing: be popular in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, water sport
Weight: 0.62
, pursuit
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, exercise
Weight: 0.56
Siblings snow skiing
Weight: 0.39
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.38
, ski
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in france 1.00
be in france 0.95
be popular in finland 0.80
is usa 0.78
be in switzerland 0.77
be expensive in australia 0.76
be in austria 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(skiing, be popular in france)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(skiing, be in france)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(skiing, be in france)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(skiing, be in france)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(skiing, be popular in finland)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skiing, be popular in finland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(skiing, is usa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(skiing, be in switzerland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(skiing, is usa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(skiing, be in switzerland)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(skiing, be popular in finland)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(skiing, be expensive in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skiing, be expensive in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be in france)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(skiing, be in austria)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(skiing, be in switzerland)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(skiing, be in austria)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(skiing, is usa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(skiing, be expensive in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(skiing, be in austria)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be popular in finland)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be in switzerland)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be expensive in australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(skiing, is usa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be in austria)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be popular in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skiing, be popular in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skiing, be popular in france)