skipping: has quality sin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.53
, game
Weight: 0.42
, exercise
Weight: 0.40
, action
Weight: 0.38
, activity
Weight: 0.38
Siblings skip
Weight: 0.32
, miss
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.30
, interrupt
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality sin 1.00
is mortal sin 0.87
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(skipping, has quality sin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(miss, has quality sin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(skipping, has quality sin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(miss, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(miss, has quality sin)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(skipping, has quality sin)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(skipping, is mortal sin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(skipping, is mortal sin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(skipping, is mortal sin)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(skipping, is mortal sin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skipping, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(skipping, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(skipping, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(skipping, has quality sin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(miss, has quality sin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(skipping, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)