skirt: be shorter in back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.67
, dress
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, clothing
Weight: 0.57
, girl
Weight: 0.55
Siblings blouse
Weight: 0.36
, gown
Weight: 0.36
, jeans
Weight: 0.35
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.35
, lingerie
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shorter in back 1.00
is short 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dress, is short) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(skirt, be shorter in back)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dress, is short)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dress, is short)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dress, is short) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(skirt, be shorter in back)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(skirt, be shorter in back)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(skirt, is short)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(skirt, is short)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(skirt, is short)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(skirt, is short)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(skirt, be shorter in back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(skirt, be shorter in back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dress, is short)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(skirt, be shorter in back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dress, is short)