skrill: is payment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deposit
Weight: 0.36
, method
Weight: 0.35
, world
Weight: 0.33
, service
Weight: 0.31
, payment
Weight: 0.25
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.24
, escort service
Weight: 0.24
, extraction
Weight: 0.24
, strategy
Weight: 0.24
, service station
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
is payment 1.00
struggle to process payments 0.81
be paid for 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(world, be paid for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(skrill, is payment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(payment, struggle to process payments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(skrill, is payment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(payment, struggle to process payments)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(world, be paid for)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(payment, struggle to process payments)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(world, be paid for)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(payment, struggle to process payments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(skrill, is payment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(world, be paid for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(skrill, is payment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(skrill, is payment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is payment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(skrill, is payment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(payment, struggle to process payments)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(world, be paid for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(payment, struggle to process payments)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(skrill, is payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(world, be paid for)