slag: seem universally hated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.67
, waste
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.48
, residue
Weight: 0.46
, debris
Weight: 0.45
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.36
, iron ore
Weight: 0.35
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.35
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.35
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
seem universally hated 1.00
is universally hated 0.98
seem hated 0.92
is hated 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(slag, seem universally hated)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(slag, is universally hated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(slag, is hated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(slag, seem hated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(slag, is universally hated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(slag, seem hated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(slag, is hated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(slag, seem hated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(slag, seem hated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slag, is universally hated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(slag, is hated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(slag, is universally hated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(slag, is hated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(slag, seem universally hated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(slag, seem universally hated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(slag, seem universally hated)