slave: were caught

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents african
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bondage
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, frederick douglass
Weight: 0.58
, serf
Weight: 0.52
, equal
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
were caught 1.00
were picked 0.80
were captured 0.77
were whipped 0.77
were punished 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(african, were captured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(slave, were caught)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(african, were captured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(african, were captured)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(african, were captured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(slave, were caught)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(slave, were caught)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(slave, were whipped)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(slave, were captured)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(slave, were whipped)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(slave, were picked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(slave, were whipped)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(slave, were caught)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(slave, were caught)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(african, were captured)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(slave, were caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(african, were captured)