sled: is weight

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.52
, gear
Weight: 0.49
, equipment
Weight: 0.48
, accessory
Weight: 0.45
Siblings toboggan
Weight: 0.41
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.35
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.34
, tractor
Weight: 0.34
, station wagon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weight 1.00
have weights 0.81
need weights 0.80
have weights on front 0.79
need front weights 0.79
need wheel weights 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have weights)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have weights on front)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tractor, need front weights)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tractor, need wheel weights)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(tractor, have weights)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tractor, have weights)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tractor, need wheel weights)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tractor, need wheel weights)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(tractor, have weights on front)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tractor, have weights on front)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tractor, need front weights)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tractor, need front weights)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sled, is weight)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sled, is weight)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tractor, have weights)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tractor, need wheel weights)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tractor, have weights on front)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sled, is weight)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tractor, need front weights)