slit: be in dogs ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aperture
Weight: 0.52
, hole
Weight: 0.50
, size
Weight: 0.47
, opening
Weight: 0.43
Siblings rectangle
Weight: 0.29
, diameter
Weight: 0.29
, waist
Weight: 0.28
, pocket
Weight: 0.28
, eye socket
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in dogs ears 1.00
be in cats ears 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(slit, be in dogs ears)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(slit, be in cats ears)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(slit, be in cats ears)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(slit, be in cats ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(slit, be in cats ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(slit, be in dogs ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(slit, be in dogs ears)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(slit, be in dogs ears)