sloth: be at amazonia

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cicrus 1.00
be at djungle 1.00
be at deserrt 1.00
be at paraguay 1.00
be at jungel 1.00
be at liberia 1.00
be at galopagos arpegio 1.00
be at kansa 1.00
be at swmp 1.00
be at amazonia 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at galopagos arpegio)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at liberia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at djungle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at jungel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at swmp)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at cicrus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lizard, be at swmp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at swmp)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(monkey, be at liberia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at liberia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(monkey, be at jungel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at jungel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(monkey, be at djungle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at djungle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(monkey, be at cicrus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at cicrus)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lizard, be at galopagos arpegio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at galopagos arpegio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazonia)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sloth, be at paraguay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sloth, be at paraguay)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at paraguay)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at paraguay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazonia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(monkey, be at cicrus)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monkey, be at jungel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at djungle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lizard, be at swmp)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monkey, be at liberia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazonia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lizard, be at galopagos arpegio)