sloth: be at commercial

Related concepts

Parents	creature Weight: 0.68 , animal Weight: 0.67 , thing Weight: 0.49 , mammal Weight: 0.48 , sin Weight: 0.48
Siblings	lizard Weight: 0.36 , gnome Weight: 0.35 , monkey Weight: 0.35 , chipmunk Weight: 0.35 , tortoise Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at geico commercial	1.00
be at commercial	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at geico commercial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lizard, be at geico commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(lizard, be at geico commercial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(sloth, be at commercial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Salient(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at commercial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(sloth, be at commercial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at commercial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(lizard, be at geico commercial)