sloth: be at costa rica

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at costa rica 1.00
be at costa rican forest 0.91
be at brazil 0.76
be at columbia s.a 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at brazil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at costa rican forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(monkey, be at brazil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at brazil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, be at costa rica)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sloth, be at brazil)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at brazil)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sloth, be at brazil)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at brazil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at costa rica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sloth, be at costa rica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(monkey, be at costa rican forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at costa rica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(monkey, be at brazil)