sloth: is good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, species
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, beast
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pets 1.00
make good pets 0.98
is animal 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is animal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(monkey, is animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monkey, is animal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(lizard, is animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lizard, is animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sloth, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sloth, make good pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sloth, make good pets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(sloth, make good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sloth, make good pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sloth, is animal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sloth, is animal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(sloth, is animal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sloth, is animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sloth, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sloth, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lizard, is animal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sloth, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(monkey, is animal)