small dog: bark more than big dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.81
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.72
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.66
, breed
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dachshund
Weight: 0.72
, terrier
Weight: 0.69
, pug
Weight: 0.64
, poodle
Weight: 0.64
, maltese
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
bark more than big dogs 1.00
bark at bigger dogs 0.97
bark at big dogs 0.97
bark at other dogs 0.95
bark at dogs 0.94
be better than big dogs 0.90
bark lot 0.90
be more aggressive than big dogs 0.89
be better than dogs 0.88
lick bigger dogs teeth 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(terrier, bark lot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(terrier, bark lot)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(terrier, bark lot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark at bigger dogs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(small dog, bark at bigger dogs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark at bigger dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(small dog, bark at big dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark lot)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(small dog, bark lot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark lot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(small dog, bark at bigger dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark at dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(small dog, bark lot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(small dog, lick bigger dogs teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(small dog, be better than big dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark at other dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(small dog, be more aggressive than big dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(small dog, bark at dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(small dog, be better than dogs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark at dogs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(small dog, bark at dogs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(small dog, be better than dogs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(small dog, bark at other dogs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(small dog, bark at other dogs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(small dog, bark at other dogs)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(small dog, be better than dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be better than dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(small dog, bark more than big dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(small dog, bark more than big dogs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(terrier, bark lot)