small dog: be at vet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.81
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.72
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.66
, breed
Weight: 0.65
Siblings terrier
Weight: 0.69
, police dog
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.41
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at vet 1.00
be at vet office 0.96
be at veterinarian office 0.83
has puppy 0.76
be at dog show 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(small dog, be at vet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dog, be at vet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at vet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at vet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(small dog, be at vet)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at vet office)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(small dog, be at vet office)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at vet office)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(small dog, be at vet office)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(small dog, be at dog show)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at dog show)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(small dog, be at dog show)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at dog show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at vet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(small dog, be at vet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dog, be at vet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(small dog, be at vet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dog, be at vet)