small intestine: compare in size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.71
, abdominal cavity
Weight: 0.68
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.68
, large intestine
Weight: 0.65
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.67
, ileum
Weight: 0.47
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.38
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare in size 1.00
compare in size of frog 0.87
has size small 0.84
has size large 0.83
is different sizes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(large intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(large intestine, has size small)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(large intestine, has size small)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(large intestine, has size large)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, has size small)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(large intestine, has size large)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(large intestine, has size large)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(large intestine, has size small)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(small intestine, compare in size)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(small intestine, has size small)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(small intestine, has size large)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(small intestine, has size large)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, has size large)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(small intestine, has size large)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(small intestine, has size small)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(small intestine, has size small)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, has size small)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(small intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(small intestine, compare in size of frog)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size of frog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(small intestine, compare in size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(large intestine, has size large)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(large intestine, has size small)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(large intestine, has size large)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(small intestine, compare in size)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(large intestine, has size small)