smallpox: was regarded as disease

Related concepts

Parents	virus Weight: 0.74 , infection Weight: 0.67 , pathogen Weight: 0.67 , vaccine Weight: 0.66
Siblings	influenza Weight: 0.38 , computer virus Weight: 0.37 , lyme disease Weight: 0.37 , anthrax Weight: 0.37 , chickenpox Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was regarded as disease	1.00
was regarded as terrible disease	0.95
has state disease	0.83
was regarded in century	0.80
was regarded in 18th century	0.80
is dreaded disease	0.78
is killer disease	0.77
be disease eradicated	0.77
is now illness	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(anthrax, has state disease)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(anthrax, has state disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(anthrax, has state disease)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(chickenpox, has state disease)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(influenza, has state disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(influenza, has state disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as terrible disease)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded in 18th century)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded in century)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(smallpox, was regarded in century)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(smallpox, was regarded in 18th century)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, has state disease)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(smallpox, was regarded in century)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(smallpox, was regarded in 18th century)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(smallpox, was regarded as terrible disease)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(smallpox, has state disease)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, be disease eradicated)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(smallpox, is now illness)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(smallpox, has state disease)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, is dreaded disease)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, is killer disease)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as terrible disease)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, is now illness)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(smallpox, has state disease)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(smallpox, is now illness)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(smallpox, was regarded in century)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(smallpox, is now illness)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(smallpox, is dreaded disease)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(smallpox, be disease eradicated)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(smallpox, was regarded in 18th century)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(smallpox, was regarded as terrible disease)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(smallpox, is killer disease)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(smallpox, is dreaded disease)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(smallpox, is killer disease)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(smallpox, is dreaded disease)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(smallpox, be disease eradicated)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(smallpox, is killer disease)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(smallpox, be disease eradicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(smallpox, was regarded as disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(anthrax, has state disease)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(chickenpox, has state disease)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(smallpox, was regarded as disease) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(influenza, has state disease)