smart card: is online

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents credit card
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.72
, card
Weight: 0.71
, debit card
Weight: 0.69
Siblings sim
Weight: 0.53
, business card
Weight: 0.43
, sound card
Weight: 0.42
, wild card
Weight: 0.42
, green card
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
is online 1.00
online 0.99
deck of are online 0.79
be against humanity online 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(smart card, is online)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(smart card, is online)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(card, deck of are online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(smart card, is online)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(card, online)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(card, is online)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(card, deck of are online)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(card, deck of are online)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(card, is online)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(card, online)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wild card, is online)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(smart card, is online)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(smart card, is online)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(card, deck of are online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(smart card, is online)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wild card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wild card, is online)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(smart card, is online)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(smart card, is online)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(card, deck of are online)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(card, online)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(card, is online)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(wild card, is online)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(card, online)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(card, is online)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(smart card, is online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(card, deck of are online)