smart person: be considered geeky

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.55
, genius
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.33
, old woman
Weight: 0.33
, dead person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered geeky 1.00
be called geeks 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(smart person, be considered geeky)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(smart person, be called geeks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(smart person, be called geeks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(smart person, be called geeks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(smart person, be called geeks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(smart person, be considered geeky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(smart person, be considered geeky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(smart person, be considered geeky)