smart person: have poor social skills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.55
, genius
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.33
, old woman
Weight: 0.33
, dead person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poor social skills 1.00
have poor skills 0.96
have social skills 0.96
have skills 0.90
tend social 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(genius, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smart person, have poor social skills)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(genius, have poor social skills)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(genius, have poor social skills)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(genius, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(smart person, have poor social skills)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(smart person, have poor skills)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(smart person, have poor skills)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(smart person, have poor skills)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(smart person, have social skills)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(smart person, have skills)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(smart person, have poor skills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(smart person, have social skills)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(smart person, have skills)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smart person, tend social)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(smart person, tend social)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smart person, have social skills)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(smart person, have skills)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(smart person, tend social)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smart person, tend social)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(smart person, have social skills)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(smart person, have skills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smart person, have poor social skills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(genius, have poor social skills)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(smart person, have poor social skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(genius, have poor social skills)