smartphone: be considered disruptive technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered disruptive technology 1.00
is disruptive technology 0.98
be considered technology 0.86
is technology 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is disruptive technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(smartphone, is technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(smartphone, is disruptive technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(smartphone, is technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is disruptive technology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(smartphone, is disruptive technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered disruptive technology)