smash: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents show
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.56
, game
Weight: 0.55
, title
Weight: 0.53
Siblings big bang theory
Weight: 0.33
, game show
Weight: 0.32
, chuck
Weight: 0.32
, mash
Weight: 0.32
, soap opera
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality joke 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smash, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smash, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smash, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(title, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chuck, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mash, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(smash, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(smash, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(smash, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mash, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(chuck, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chuck, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(smash, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(smash, has quality joke)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(smash, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(smash, has quality joke)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality joke)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smash, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(chuck, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mash, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(smash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)