smog: be bad in la

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, acid rain
Weight: 0.34
, dust
Weight: 0.34
, mercury
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in la 1.00
be in la 0.96
be bad in los angeles 0.80
be problem in los angeles 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(smog, be bad in la)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(smog, be in la)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(smog, be in la)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(smog, be in la)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad in los angeles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(smog, be bad in los angeles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad in los angeles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smog, be in la)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(smog, be problem in los angeles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(smog, be problem in los angeles)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(smog, be problem in los angeles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(smog, be bad in los angeles)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(smog, be problem in los angeles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad in la)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(smog, be bad in la) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(smog, be bad in la)