smog: be bad to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, acid rain
Weight: 0.34
, dust
Weight: 0.34
, mercury
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad to humans 1.00
be important to humans 0.92
hurt humans 0.88
be dangerous to people 0.76
affect animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smog, be bad to humans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(air pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smog, be bad to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(air pollution, affect animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, be dangerous to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be dangerous to people)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, affect animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dust, be important to humans)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(acid rain, affect animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be dangerous to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad to humans)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(air pollution, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(smog, be bad to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dust, be important to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(dust, be important to humans)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(acid rain, affect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acid rain, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(smog, be bad to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(smog, be important to humans)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(smog, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(smog, be important to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(smog, be dangerous to people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(smog, be dangerous to people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(smog, be dangerous to people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(smog, affect animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(smog, affect animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(smog, affect animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(smog, affect animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smog, be dangerous to people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smog, be important to humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(smog, hurt humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(smog, hurt humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(smog, hurt humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(smog, hurt humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(smog, be bad to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be dangerous to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dust, be important to humans)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(acid rain, affect animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(air pollution, affect animals)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(smog, be bad to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be dangerous to people)