smog: be worse in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.53
Siblings carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, acid rain
Weight: 0.34
, dust
Weight: 0.34
, mercury
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse in winter 1.00
be worse in summer 0.95
be typically worse in summer 0.89
be problem during summer 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(smog, be worse in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(smog, be worse in summer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(smog, be worse in summer)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(smog, be worse in summer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(smog, be typically worse in summer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(smog, be typically worse in summer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(smog, be typically worse in summer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(smog, be worse in summer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(smog, be typically worse in summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(smog, be problem during summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(smog, be problem during summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(smog, be problem during summer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(smog, be problem during summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(smog, be worse in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(smog, be worse in winter)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(smog, be worse in winter)