smoke detector: be replaced 10 years

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.75
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.72
, alarm
Weight: 0.71
, electronic device
Weight: 0.70
Siblings ionization
Weight: 0.39
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.39
, cooling device
Weight: 0.36
, car alarm
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be replaced 10 years 1.00
is replaced 0.92
need replaced 0.90
be good for 10 years 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(smoke alarm, be replaced 10 years)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(smoke alarm, need replaced)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(smoke alarm, is replaced)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(smoke alarm, is replaced)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(smoke alarm, is replaced)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(smoke alarm, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(smoke alarm, be replaced 10 years)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(smoke alarm, need replaced)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(smoke alarm, need replaced)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(smoke detector, is replaced)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(smoke detector, need replaced)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, is replaced)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, need replaced)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(smoke detector, is replaced)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smoke detector, need replaced)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, be good for 10 years)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, need replaced)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, is replaced)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(smoke alarm, is replaced)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(smoke alarm, be replaced 10 years)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be replaced 10 years)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smoke alarm, need replaced)